Daily Digest - February 24: What We Didn't Bargain For

Feb 24, 2014Rachel Goldfarb

Click here to receive the Daily Digest via email.

Obama is Showing Some Guts on the Budget. Don't Celebrate Just Yet. (TNR)

The president would put chained CPI, a method of calculating Social Security increases that is popular with Republicans, back on the table at any hint of a Grand Bargain, says Danny Vinik.

Click here to receive the Daily Digest via email.

Obama is Showing Some Guts on the Budget. Don't Celebrate Just Yet. (TNR)

The president would put chained CPI, a method of calculating Social Security increases that is popular with Republicans, back on the table at any hint of a Grand Bargain, says Danny Vinik.

The Grand Bargain’s Dead. What Now? (MSNBC)

Without a Grand Bargain on the budget, Suzy Khimm says that fundamental disagreements on benefits programs will have to wait until at least after midterm elections, and maybe even until 2016.

Why Wage Hikes Should Be All the Rage (Policy Shop)

As states, cities, and big retailers like Gap Inc. move forward to raise wages, Amy Traub argues that this piecemeal approach helps some workers and keeps the national conversation going.

UAW Demands Labour Board Review Volkswagen Plant Vote (The Guardian)

The appeal focuses on the "firestorm of interference" from outside groups and Tennessee politicians, reports Dominic Rushe. The union lost narrowly, and the appeal could lead to a new election.

Can These College Football Players Actually Unionize? (MoJo)

As football players at Northwestern University begin the unionization fight with a hearing at the Chicago regional National Labor Relations Board, Matt Connolly explains the process and potential complications.

Wisconsin’s Legacy for Unions (NYT)

Steven Greenhouse reports on how a Wisconsin law gutting the powers of public-sector unions to collectively bargain has changed things for those workers. No surprises: it's not looking good.

Share This

Daily Digest - February 21: When Wall Street Worries Too Much

Feb 21, 2014Rachel Goldfarb

Click here to receive the Daily Digest via email.

An Aggressive Fed Finds Critics on Wall Street (NYT)

Click here to receive the Daily Digest via email.

An Aggressive Fed Finds Critics on Wall Street (NYT)

Some bankers blame easy money for the boom-and-bust cycle, writes Peter Eavis, but Fed supporters like Roosevelt Institute Fellow Mike Konczal argue the critics have unrealistic expectations about the economy.

You Still Need to Care About Sky-High Wall Street CEO Pay (U.S. News & World Report)

Pat Garofalo says that while high CEO pay is a problem across the board, it's especially worrisome on Wall Street, where a CEO's decisions can affect the entire economy.

South Carolina Governor Says Ford, GM, Chrysler Union Jobs not Welcome in State (Detroit Free Press)

Governor Nikki Haley is happier to have unionized companies, including many Detroit-based auto manufacturers, keep their jobs far, far away from her right-to-work state, reports Rudolph Bell.

Why Gap’s Wage Hike Matters (MSNBC)

Ned Resnikoff argues that with House Republicans unlikely to allow a vote on a minimum wage increase, it's worth cheering for companies that do it themselves.

Obama to Drop Entitlement Cuts from 2015 Budget (POLITICO)

Reid J. Epstein reports that the president is done floating compromises for the GOP in his budget. Chained CPI, an inflation metric that would reduce benefit increases for Social Security, is gone.

New on Next New Deal

In Campus Network’s Summer Academy, Students Learn What Good Work Really Looks Like

Roosevelt Institute | Campus Network's Jeff Raines and Joe Swanson consider the effect that the Summer Academy Fellowship has had on their college experiences and career goals.

  • Note: Current students can still apply for the Campus Network's Summer Academy. For more information, click here.

We Need More Nuance from the CBO

Presenting a single number instead of a range of economic opinions is irresponsible of the Congressional Budget Office, writes Jeff Madrick, Roosevelt Institute Senior Fellow and Director of the Bernard L. Schwartz Rediscovering Government Initiative.

Share This

Daily Digest - February 20: Monopoly Power is a Package Deal

Feb 20, 2014Rachel Goldfarb

Click here to receive the Daily Digest via email.

How to Tackle the Great American Cable Monopoly (FT)

Click here to receive the Daily Digest via email.

How to Tackle the Great American Cable Monopoly (FT)

Roosevelt Institute Fellow Susan Crawford points out that the real issue in the Comcast-Time Warner Cable merger is how much power that monopoly would have over markets like high-speed Internet access and TV programming.

Volkswagen Official Threatens to Block Expansion if Workers Won't Unionize (Chattanooga Times Free Press)

The head of VW's works council complained about anti-union efforts in Chattanooga when he suggested that the company doesn't have to invest further in the South, reports the Times Free Press.

  • Roosevelt Take: Roosevelt Institute Senior Fellow Richard Kirsch explains why the UAW effort in Chattanooga failed despite VW's neutrality.

Even Economists Cited By The CBO Disagree With Its Minimum Wage Report (HuffPo)

The general consensus seems to be that raising the minimum wage will have little effect on employment, reports Jillian Berman, and economists are questioning the CBO's methodology.

Gap to Raise Minimum Hourly Pay (NYT)

The clothing retailer cited the need to invest in staff as it announced that it will raise wages to $9 an hour this year and $10 next year, reports Steven Greenhouse.

Wal-Mart Says ‘Looking’ at Support of Federal Minimum Wage Rise (Bloomberg News)

Renee Dudley writes that Wal-Mart is considering whether an increased minimum wage could mean that shoppers have more money to spend. That’s what proponents have been saying all along.

Republicans' Favorite National-Debt Researchers Are Now Even More Discredited (TNR)

Danny Vinik reports on a new study showing that the trajectory of debt – growing or shrinking – is what affects growth. That makes long-term planning more important than any debt-to-GDP threshold.

  • Roosevelt Take: Roosevelt Institute Fellow Mike Konczal wrote about the data problems discovered in the Reinhart-Rogoff study on debt-to-GDP ratios, which first raised doubts about its conclusions.

New on Next New Deal

Solving California's Water Crisis Requires A Look Beyond This Year

Focusing on reactionary measures and short-term solutions will only lead to even bigger problems, writes Melia Ungson, the Roosevelt Institute | Campus Network's Senior Fellow for Energy and Environment.

Share This

Daily Digest - February 19: The Misleading Math on the Minimum Wage

Feb 19, 2014Rachel Goldfarb

Click here to receive the Daily Digest via email.

In Its Minimum-Wage Report, the CBO Places Its Thumb on the Scale (TNR)

The new report, which predicts a $10.10 minimum wage could cost as many as 1 million jobs, overstates the potential downside and understates the benefits, argues Roosevelt Institute Fellow Mike Konczal.

Click here to receive the Daily Digest via email.

In Its Minimum-Wage Report, the CBO Places Its Thumb on the Scale (TNR)

The new report, which predicts a $10.10 minimum wage could cost as many as 1 million jobs, overstates the potential downside and understates the benefits, argues Roosevelt Institute Fellow Mike Konczal.

Student Debt May Hurt Housing Recovery by Hampering First-Time Buyers (WaPo)

Dina ElBoghdady reports that new rules could be keeping young would-be homeowners with student loans out of the market, and that has implications for the housing market and the broader economy.

Businesses Are Swimming in Money: Profit Protection Will Not Help With Economic Recovery (Pacific Standard)

Martin Hart-Landsberg uses charts to demonstrate just how much money businesses are sitting on today. He says this data shows that pro-business policy won't speed up the recovery for everyone else.

New on Next New Deal

In VW Vote, Republicans Fight the Really Radical Idea that Workers Should Have a Voice in Business

Roosevelt Institute Senior Fellow Richard Kirsch explains how the GOP influenced the United Auto Workers' loss at Volkswagen's Chattanooga plant, even though the company wasn't opposed to the union.

Finding Affordable Housing Solutions in Boston

Gavin O'Brien, a member of the Greater Boston chapter of Roosevelt Institute | Pipeline, lays out possible policy solutions to the soaring cost of living in Boston, from cooperative arrangements to affordable housing trusts.

Snowed Under: When Keeping Schools Open Puts Low-Income Students Further Behind

Attendance data doesn't support the claim that NYC schools needed to stay open during last week's snowstorm so kids could eat, says Sarah Pfeifer Vandekerckhove, the Roosevelt Institute's Director of Programmatic Operations.

Share This

In VW Vote, Republicans Fight the Really Radical Idea that Workers Should Have a Voice in Business

Feb 18, 2014Richard Kirsch

When a company is not fighting against a union, why do that union's efforts fail - and what does that say about the U.S. model for labor?

When a company is not fighting against a union, why do that union's efforts fail - and what does that say about the U.S. model for labor?

Current management theory recognizes that businesses do better when employees are involved in decision-making. But that trend ran smack into the paternalistic view that workers are replaceable parts in the narrow vote by workers at Volkswagen (VW) in Chattanooga, Tennessee to reject the United Auto Workers (UAW). Here was a case where right-wing politicians, who usually worship at the alter of business, decided that a business that actually valued its employees’ ideas was un-American.

In many ways what is remarkable about the vote of workers at a VW plant in Tennessee to reject the UAW was how close it was. Despite an aggressive campaign against the union by the state’s Republican leadership, if just 43 workers out of 1,338 had switched their votes, the union would have been voted in. The 626 workers who voted yes stood up to a campaign of intimidation by elected officials and right wing organizations that threaten not just their jobs, but harm to communities in the rest of the State. When it is so much safer to say no, we should recognize the guts of the hundreds of workers who by voting yes, declared that they deserved respect at their workplace.

The main motivation for even having the union vote in Tennessee was not what most people assume, which would be to increase wages and benefits. While wages at the VW plant are far from enough to put workers comfortably in the middle-class, they are in line with wages paid to newly hired employees at plants represented by the UAW. In today’s era of diminished expectations by workers (and heightened ones by shareholders), VW workers in Tennessee were not organizing for a raise. Instead, they were calling for the establishment of European style works councils, which give workers a role in key decision-making at the factory.

Works councils are common throughout Western Europe, and are often legally required at businesses with as few as five employees. Typically elected by all the workers at a business, including union and non-union members, the works councils join management in a range of decisions, including: monitoring and enforcement of employment and occupational safety and health laws, setting work and production schedules, introducing new technology, and downsizing the plant. To facilitate their role, the members of the works council have the right to information about financial and business matters, employment levels and structural changes to the work environment.

Clearly, works councils would be a lot more revolutionary in U.S. businesses than voting in a union, because works councils establish a right to what was called in the early days of union organizing “industrial democracy.” They give workers a real voice at work. Companies like VW have found, in line with modern management theory, that giving workers a voice is good for business.

Organizing the southern auto plants established by foreign auto companies over the past two decades is a top priority of the United Auto Workers. The auto companies were attracted to the South by a combination of low wages, workers with manufacturing experience, both laws and a political climate that discourage unionization, access to growing markets, and huge state-government tax incentives.  In 2008, Tennessee awarded VW a package worth $577 million to build the plant in Chattanooga, the richest package ever awarded to a foreign auto manufacturer at the time.

The UAW decided to try a new strategy in its organizing effort at VW in Chattanooga, based on establishing a works council. The councils operate at every VW plant in the world, except those in China and the U.S. However, under American labor law, VW cannot establish a works council on its own. When the National Labor Relations Act was enacted in 1935, it was common for employers to set up unions they controlled, as a way to block unions that would really represent the workers. To prevent company-controlled unions, the NLRA prohibited the kind of joint management-worker decision-making bodies envisioned by a works council. For the UAW, VW’s openness to a works council presented a new avenue for organizing.

While much has been made in the press about VW signing a neutrality agreement with the UAW, that act does not mean that VW’s American managers welcomed the union. Under the neutrality accord, VW rejected common anti-union practices among U.S. employers, like refusing to allow the union to speak with workers on site, requiring workers to attend anti-union meetings and harassing union supporters. However, the UAW too made concessions, including agreeing not to meet with workers in their homes, which is one of the most powerful ways of building support and leadership for unions.

The main visible opposition at the factory came from salaried workers and low-level supervisors, who are not part of management but also were not eligible to vote in the union election, another barrier in American labor law. Mike Elk, who covered the vote for In These Times, reports many of these employees adopted the traditional view of American managers, that the union has no interest in producing quality cars and would interfere with corporate decisions. In the hierarchical American work culture, it is not surprising that workers who have been given some authority might be resentful of ceding some of their new power to a council that included hourly workers.

Still, the close vote made it absolutely clear that deciding factor was the strident opposition of Republican U.S. Senator Bob Corker, Republican Governor Bill Haslam and Republican legislative leaders, who said that a vote for the UAW would scare other auto manufacturers away from Tennessee and dry up any more state support for expanding production at the factory. They made these threats even though GM announced this summer that it will add 1,800 jobs to a UAW organized factory in Spring Hills, Tennessee.

The vote in Chattanooga should be seen as another skirmish in the growing debate about the role of workers in driving the 21st century economy. Southern politicians’ strong anti-union stance has roots in racist opposition to unions, which gave African-Americans a voice at work and better wages. Their virulent anti-union stance today continues the suppression of wages that has impeded the southern economy from the days of slavery. But today, the southern low-wage strategy has become a national model, led by the behemoth of southern companies, today’s largest employer, Walmart.

The vote at VW highlights how the U.S.’s antiquated labor laws block economic progress. If the law allowed the establishment of works councils without the requirement that a union win a majority vote, it would provide a new vehicle to improve the performance and competitiveness of U.S. firms. The continued strength of many European manufacturers, even facing global competition from firms in lower-wage countries, demonstrates that giving workers a voice strengthens business. That lesson, a foundational assumption in the high-tech sector, makes sense for American manufacturers too. If our goal is to build an economy of broadly shared prosperity, giving workers a real voice in business decisions is a far better way to compete than slashing wages.

Richard Kirsch is a Senior Fellow at the Roosevelt Institute, a Senior Adviser to USAction, and the author of Fighting for Our Health. He was National Campaign Manager of Health Care for America Now during the legislative battle to pass reform.

Share This

Daily Digest - February 18: Escape from Hooverville

Feb 18, 2014Rachel Goldfarb

Click here to receive the Daily Digest via email.

Worst. President. Ever. (All In With Chris Hayes)

Click here to receive the Daily Digest via email.

Worst. President. Ever. (All In With Chris Hayes)

In honor of Presidents' Day, Chris Hayes invites Roosevelt Institute Fellow Dorian Warren to discuss his pick for the worst: Herbert Hoover, Franklin D. Roosevelt's predecessor during the Great Depression.

The Silicon Valley Labor Scandals Prove Minimum Wage Hikes Don't Cost Jobs (TNR)

Roosevelt Institute Fellow Mike Konczal uses the coordinated efforts of Silicon Valley giants to control labor markets to demonstrate why raising the minimum wage will reduce job vacancies, not jobs.

Barons of Broadband (NYT)

Paul Krugman argues against the Comcast-Time Warner Cable merger, using Roosevelt Institute Fellow Susan Crawford's work to point out how the telecommunications industry already stifles innovation.

How Big Banks Are Cashing In On Food Stamps (TAP)

Electronic benefits transfer cards may be easier for the government, writes Virginia Eubanks, but they allow banks to make profits from the country's most unfortunate with fees galore.

The Stimulus Act was a Success — and We Need Another (WaPo)

George Zornick points out that the stimulus did its job – providing the economy with a temporary bump – just fine. Republicans who denounce it are ignoring the bill's intended purpose.

After Rejecting UAW, VW Workers May Still Get Works Council (Reuters)

Bernie Woodall and Amanda Becker report that Volkswagen is looking into whether a works council, elected workers who help set workplace rules, could be permitted at its Chattanooga plant under U.S. labor law, in lieu of a union.

New on Next New Deal

AOL's CEO Proves Women and Children Make Easy Scapegoats in the Workplace

Tim Armstrong's comments about "distressed babies" show that some companies still treat maternity care as an extravagance, even during times of profit, says Roosevelt Institute Fellow Andrea Flynn.

Share This

Daily Digest - February 14: America Loses When Cable Giants Play Monopoly

Feb 14, 2014Rachel Goldfarb

Click here to receive the Daily Digest via email.

There will not be a new Daily Digest on Monday, February 17, in observance of Presidents' Day. The Daily Digest will return on Tuesday, February 18.

Comcast's Time Warner Deal Is Bad for America (Bloomberg Businessweek)

Click here to receive the Daily Digest via email.

There will not be a new Daily Digest on Monday, February 17, in observance of Presidents' Day. The Daily Digest will return on Tuesday, February 18.

Comcast's Time Warner Deal Is Bad for America (Bloomberg Businessweek)

A Comcast-Time Warner Cable monopoly won't just limit choice for consumers, says Roosevelt Institute Fellow Susan Crawford. The combined company will have no reason to upgrade infrastructure.

Just How Much Do Republicans Hate Unions? (TAP)

Volkswagen seems to be supportive of a union at its Chattanooga, TN plant. That means the GOP pushback is just about opposing organized labor in general, writes Paul Waldman.

It's Time to Kill the Debt Limit (The Daily Beast)

Jamelle Bouie says that the easiest way to stop the cycle of debt ceiling crises of the past few years would be to abolish it altogether, since it's a pointless and redundant concept anyway.

Should We Place A Tax On All College Graduates? (Forbes)

Josh Freedman considers this alternative model of funding for public higher education. He quotes Roosevelt Institute Fellow Mike Konczal to express concern about whether such taxes would lead to class-segregated schools.

How Credit-Card Debt Can Help the Poor (NYT)

Since good credit affects so many aspects of life in the U.S., Shaila Dewan writes that special loans that build credit alongside savings could make a big difference.

New on Next New Deal

Conservatives Concerned About the CBO and the Dignity of Work Should Consider a Higher Minimum Wage

Roosevelt Institute Fellow Mike Konczal suggests that a higher minimum wage could solve Republican concerns about people who choose to work less due to the Affordable Care Act and means-tested programs.

A New Medicare Penalty Puts the Focus on Community Health

Anisha Hegde, Roosevelt Institute | Campus Network Senior Fellow for Health Care, says that expanding community health resources and workers will help patients and reduce costs in the health care system.

Share This

Conservatives Concerned About the CBO and the Dignity of Work Should Consider a Higher Minimum Wage

Feb 13, 2014Mike Konczal

It’s a shame that Ron Unz’s conservative case for a higher minimum wage gets caught up in the debate over immigration politics, because the arguments are broader and more fascinating, and incredibly important to have as part of the debate. This is especially true in light of last week’s CBO report, which has sent conservatives running to the barricades over the impact of Obamacare on waged work in this country. The conservative case for a minimum wage would address the two main concerns the right has displayed on this topic.

Broadly speaking, as summarized by Josh Barro here, there are two separate elements of the conservative take on Obamacare and the CBO’s findings. The first is that it allows people to break “job lock” and leave the labor market. This means there are fewer people working, which concerns conservatives because, as Ross Douthat put it, paid wage labor is “essential to dignity, mobility and social equality,” and they “see its decline as something to be fiercely resisted.” [1]

The second is that, because of the subsidies that are given to low-wage workers, these workers face a higher marginal tax rate. If there are subsidies for low-wage workers, as those workers make more money those subsidies are phased out. The fact that they are losing money while earning more money, or that a higher income means a smaller subsidy, functions like a tax. And this means that workers will work a bit less. Liberals in general don’t like this (though they do like that both effects will increase wages, as well they should), but understand it is going to be part of any type of means-tested income support.

Where does the minimum wage come in?

To address the first complaint, it’s important to keep in mind that the “dignity of work” isn’t a static concept, but tied directly to the conditions of work itself. If you ask the people striking against their low-wage job right now, you’ll find that things like working unpaid hours or erratic scheduling are also part of their complaints. As a result of these conditions, the work is socially tagged as undignified, degrading, erratic, and unpredictable. [2]

So driving the wages straight up can help counteract this. As Ron Unz writes, “consider the impact of a sharp rise in the minimum wage, sufficient to remove the taint of poverty overhanging so many of our lower-tier jobs.” This would, in turn, make lower-tier service jobs more attractive from a social perspective, increasing the level of dignity for those who hold them. This would in turn make people much more likely to seek out and hold said jobs. As I’ve argued elsewhere, by reducing vacancies, encouraging job searches and tightening the low-wage labor market, a higher minimum wage would also de facto give low-wage workers more power in the workplace, which would help reduce the petty tyrannies that come with low-wage work.

The second issue comes from effective marginal tax rates, or the burden low-wage workers face as income support is phased out. And the common bipartisan alternative to the minimum wage, increasing the earned-income tax credit (EITC), doubles down on this. There are ways to manage it and make the effective tax rate have less of a bite. But it’s essential to the DNA of means-tested income support that it’ll eventually phase out, and as a result impose some higher marginal tax rate. Conservatives who support a higher earned-income tax credit play into this as well.

The minimum wage, however, poses no such higher effective tax rate. If you work more hours at the minimum wage, there’s no effective tax because the minimum wage doesn't phase out. So if the slight effect of higher effective tax rates of Obamacare is driving you up the wall, perhaps now is a good time to consider this positive side of the minimum wage.

Additional:

I’ve seen many people point out that there’s an administrative simplicity and cost-effectiveness to the minimum wage over the EITC, amplifying the case for them to act as complements to each other instead of substitutes. But I had no idea that, according to the IRS and Treasury, the EITC’s improper payment rate is between 21 and 25 percent. This includes overpayments as well as underpayments.

That simply doesn’t happen with the minimum wage. And if you are a conservative who wants to “simplify” government, or if bringing the impact of government as close as possible to those who need help - say directly in the workplace rather than in the complicated and confusing tax code administered by a faraway IRS - is important to your subsidiarity view of policy, a bigger role for the minimum wage is essential.

[1] This will sound snarky, but I genuinely mean it: I want to see a conservative take on Nickel and Dimed, where maids cleaning bathrooms experience “social equality” with the people paying them.

[2] Remember that Dave Chappelle comedy skit about the person who gets a fast food job to impress his community, and finds that it isn’t quite as dignified as he thought?

Follow or contact the Rortybomb blog:

  

It’s a shame that Ron Unz’s conservative case for a higher minimum wage gets caught up in the debate over immigration politics, because the arguments are broader and more fascinating, and incredibly important to have as part of the debate. This is especially true in light of last week’s CBO report, which has sent conservatives running to the barricades over the impact of Obamacare on waged work in this country. The conservative case for a minimum wage would address the two main concerns the right has displayed on this topic.

Broadly speaking, as summarized by Josh Barro here, there are two separate elements of the conservative take on Obamacare and the CBO’s findings. The first is that it allows people to break “job lock” and leave the labor market. This means there are fewer people working, which concerns conservatives because, as Ross Douthat put it, paid wage labor is “essential to dignity, mobility and social equality,” and they “see its decline as something to be fiercely resisted.” [1]

The second is that, because of the subsidies that are given to low-wage workers, these workers face a higher marginal tax rate. If there are subsidies for low-wage workers, as those workers make more money those subsidies are phased out. The fact that they are losing money while earning more money, or that a higher income means a smaller subsidy, functions like a tax. And this means that workers will work a bit less. Liberals in general don’t like this (though they do like that both effects will increase wages, as well they should), but understand it is going to be part of any type of means-tested income support.

Where does the minimum wage come in?

To address the first complaint, it’s important to keep in mind that the “dignity of work” isn’t a static concept, but tied directly to the conditions of work itself. If you ask the people striking against their low-wage job right now, you’ll find that things like working unpaid hours or erratic scheduling are also part of their complaints. As a result of these conditions, the work is socially tagged as undignified, degrading, erratic, and unpredictable. [2]

So driving the wages straight up can help counteract this. As Ron Unz writes, “consider the impact of a sharp rise in the minimum wage, sufficient to remove the taint of poverty overhanging so many of our lower-tier jobs.” This would, in turn, make lower-tier service jobs more attractive from a social perspective, increasing the level of dignity for those who hold them. This would in turn make people much more likely to seek out and hold said jobs. As I’ve argued elsewhere, by reducing vacancies, encouraging job searches and tightening the low-wage labor market, a higher minimum wage would also de facto give low-wage workers more power in the workplace, which would help reduce the petty tyrannies that come with low-wage work.

The second issue comes from effective marginal tax rates, or the burden low-wage workers face as income support is phased out. And the common bipartisan alternative to the minimum wage, increasing the earned-income tax credit (EITC), doubles down on this. There are ways to manage it and make the effective tax rate have less of a bite. But it’s essential to the DNA of means-tested income support that it’ll eventually phase out, and as a result impose some higher marginal tax rate. Conservatives who support a higher earned-income tax credit play into this as well.

The minimum wage, however, poses no such higher effective tax rate. If you work more hours at the minimum wage, there’s no effective tax because the minimum wage doesn't phase out. So if the slight effect of higher effective tax rates of Obamacare is driving you up the wall, perhaps now is a good time to consider this positive side of the minimum wage.

Additional:

I’ve seen many people point out that there’s an administrative simplicity and cost-effectiveness to the minimum wage over the EITC, amplifying the case for them to act as complements to each other instead of substitutes. But I had no idea that, according to the IRS and Treasury, the EITC’s improper payment rate is between 21 and 25 percent. This includes overpayments as well as underpayments.

That simply doesn’t happen with the minimum wage. And if you are a conservative who wants to “simplify” government, or if bringing the impact of government as close as possible to those who need help - say directly in the workplace rather than in the complicated and confusing tax code administered by a faraway IRS - is important to your subsidiarity view of policy, a bigger role for the minimum wage is essential.

[1] This will sound snarky, but I genuinely mean it: I want to see a conservative take on Nickel and Dimed, where maids cleaning bathrooms experience “social equality” with the people paying them.

[2] Remember that Dave Chappelle comedy skit about the person who gets a fast food job to impress his community, and finds that it isn’t quite as dignified as he thought?

Follow or contact the Rortybomb blog:

  

Share This

Daily Digest - February 12: Higher Pay Won't Hurt Workers

Feb 12, 2014Rachel Goldfarb

Click here to receive the Daily Digest via email

Who Would Benefit From a Minimum Wage Hike? (Your Call Radio)

The aggregate effects of a minimum wage increase wouldn't lead to job losses, says Roosevelt Institute Fellow Mike Konczal, and it's the easiest way to boost our economy.

Click here to receive the Daily Digest via email

Who Would Benefit From a Minimum Wage Hike? (Your Call Radio)

The aggregate effects of a minimum wage increase wouldn't lead to job losses, says Roosevelt Institute Fellow Mike Konczal, and it's the easiest way to boost our economy.

Now That Boehner Has Backed Down, Let's Fix The Debt Ceiling For Good (TNR)

Since the House GOP has approved a clean debt limit increase, Eric Posner argues it's time to pass legislation that would end this game of chicken over the national debt forever.

Yellen Sets a Familiar Direction for the Fed (NYT)

Binyamin Appelbaum reports that the new Fed chair's testimony to the House Financial Services Committee emphasized that many policies will remain the same under her leadership.

What Do the Jobless Do When the Benefits End? (WaPo)

Ylan Mui interviews people about how they're getting by, and since none of her subjects have full-time work, the GOP theory that benefits keep people from taking jobs seems unlikely.

Why Democrats Will Win on Unemployment Insurance (The Atlantic)

Sarah Mimms writes that the Democrats will come out on top whether they get an extension on unemployment insurance or not. No extension? Then there's the campaign message for 2014.

Responsible Contractors Only: How to Ensure Obama’s Minimum Wage Order Is Enforced (PolicyShop)

Building a "responsible contractor" enforcement mechanism into his executive order will help the president to ensure workers actually get the raise he called for, writes Amy Traub.

Anatomy of a Hunger Crisis (MSNBC)

New York City's food pantries are already unable to handle the needs of the city's hungry, according to Ned Resnikoff, and the president has just signed another round of cuts to food stamps.

New on Next New Deal

The Three Big Questions Janet Yellen Should Answer in Today's Testimony

With the new Fed chair delivering her first testimony to Congress this week, Roosevelt Institute Fellow Mike Konczal lays out what we need to know about her views on the taper, financial reform, and unemployment.

Share This

Daily Digest - February 11: Raising Wages from Coast to Coast

Feb 11, 2014Rachel Goldfarb

Click here to receive the Daily Digest via email.

The Minimum Wage Fight: From San Francisco to de Blasio’s New York (Reuters)

Mayor de Blasio and others should learn from San Francisco's example when it comes to lifting standards for low-wage workers, write Ken Jacobs and Michael Reich.

Click here to receive the Daily Digest via email.

The Minimum Wage Fight: From San Francisco to de Blasio’s New York (Reuters)

Mayor de Blasio and others should learn from San Francisco's example when it comes to lifting standards for low-wage workers, write Ken Jacobs and Michael Reich.

Horrible Bosses (TAP)

Paul Waldman writes that some employers are blaming the President and his health care policies for benefit cuts and stagnant wages. But workers should know: their bosses are lying.

Labor Battle at Kellogg Plant in Memphis Drags On (NYT)

As the lockout approaches four months, Steven Greenhouse says these workers are determined not to accept a contract that could replace them all with "casuals," or lower-paid temps.

New York AG To Put Heat On Banks for Foreclosed Properties (WSJ)

Eric Schneiderman wants to require banks to take better care of so-called "zombie properties" they've foreclosed on, reports Andrew R. Johnson, and his proposed bill would reduce neighborhood blight.

Obama's Partly to Blame for the Postal Service's Backward Ways (TNR)

Progressive reform, including postal banking, is in reach for the USPS, says David Dayen, if only the president would step up and fill the five empty seats on its Board of Governors.

Support the Student Loan Borrower Bill of Rights (Blog of the Century)

Jill Silos-Rooney says Senator Warren's proposal bets that college grads who have fewer struggles with debt will be better for the economy than government profits on student loans.

House GOP Rolls Dice on Debt Limit (Politico)

Jake Sherman and Ginger Gibson report on the GOP's plan to pass a debt ceiling increase by tying it to fixing military benefit cuts. That probably won't sway Democrats from a clean bill.

Share This

Pages